Comments on: AOL: 90% clicks on the first page, 4% on second http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/ Internet, advertising, technology, etc... Sat, 19 May 2012 16:04:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: søkemotoroptimalisering http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-12659 søkemotoroptimalisering Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:39:22 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-12659 I personally believe that it is better to be on 10. place than 9 because it is more visible position, and from my experience, this position receives more clicks. I personally believe that it is better to be on 10. place than 9 because it is more visible position, and from my experience, this position receives more clicks.

]]> By: MaKa http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-14 MaKa Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:39:14 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-14 @ Pat Why wouldn't it be correct that #10 is more popular than #9. It makes sense to me. People scroll down to got to the next page selector and they either spot #10 and change their mind or simply click on #10 by accident while scrolling down. @ Pat

Why wouldn’t it be correct that #10 is more popular than #9. It makes sense to me. People scroll down to got to the next page selector and they either spot #10 and change their mind or simply click on #10 by accident while scrolling down.

]]> By: AOL statistika, reddit.com in dva tisočaka. « rufbetten [moje postelje] http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-12 AOL statistika, reddit.com in dva tisočaka. « rufbetten [moje postelje] Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:28:09 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-12 [...] Satistiko, preračunano iz AOLovih iskanj sem objavil še na svojem drugem bolj globalno usmerjenem blogu. To sem storil z namenom, da dobim tam kakšen obisk več s pomočjo večjih web 2.0 servisov. Žal sem sem predolgo obiral s prevodom in sem bil zato nekaj dni prepozen, ker se je podobna obdelava kot je bila moja že začela pojavljati. Moja posebnost so bili ljubki grafki. [...] [...] Satistiko, preračunano iz AOLovih iskanj sem objavil še na svojem drugem bolj globalno usmerjenem blogu. To sem storil z namenom, da dobim tam kakšen obisk več s pomočjo večjih web 2.0 servisov. Žal sem sem predolgo obiral s prevodom in sem bil zato nekaj dni prepozen, ker se je podobna obdelava kot je bila moja že začela pojavljati. Moja posebnost so bili ljubki grafki. [...]

]]> By: Matt http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Matt Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:54:10 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-9 Great analysis, thanks. I would point out that I think it would be highly dangerous to apply these types of numbers to search behavior on Google or Yahoo. AOL customers are highly unique web users and behave very differently than standard ISP users. But great info nonetheless. Great analysis, thanks. I would point out that I think it would be highly dangerous to apply these types of numbers to search behavior on Google or Yahoo. AOL customers are highly unique web users and behave very differently than standard ISP users.

But great info nonetheless.

]]> By: ruph http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-8 ruph Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:22:41 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-8 <a href="#comment-7" rel="nofollow">Pat Rock</a> This is not correct.. ... 1. page .... 8. place = 579206 9. place = 549196 10. place = 577325 .... 2. page ... 11. place = 127688 12. place = 108555 Second page is clearly second. But it is better to be #10 than #9. <strong>#9 is the unlucky one...</strong> Pat Rock This is not correct..

… 1. page ….
8. place = 579206
9. place = 549196
10. place = 577325

…. 2. page …
11. place = 127688
12. place = 108555

Second page is clearly second. But it is better to be #10 than #9.
#9 is the unlucky one…

]]> By: Pat Rock http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Pat Rock Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:30:15 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-7 One thing that is coming out (and you can easily check this) is that its better to be #1 on page 2, than #10 on page 1. (in aol dataset search for rank 11). Pat One thing that is coming out (and you can easily check this) is that its better to be #1 on page 2, than #10 on page 1. (in aol dataset search for rank 11).

Pat

]]> By: ruph http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-6 ruph Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:46 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-6 <a href=#comment-5 rel="nofollow">Geir</a> Yep, I agree. I thought about it to, but it is a lot harder to achieve that.. It would be a lot more informative if I could somehow differ between users searching for a domain (a lot of people is searching domain name in search engines instead just entering it in adress bar) and others... Geir Yep, I agree. I thought about it to, but it is a lot harder to achieve that..

It would be a lot more informative if I could somehow differ between users searching for a domain (a lot of people is searching domain name in search engines instead just entering it in adress bar) and others…

]]> By: Geir http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Geir Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:15:21 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-5 Interesting results. I wonder if one should differ between searches where the user is searching for a specific page or just searching for information on topic. I often just type "blabla wikipedia" in google instead of first opening wikipedia and then use the search feature there. In most cases the page I'm looking is on top. Interesting results. I wonder if one should differ between searches where the user is searching for a specific page or just searching for information on topic. I often just type “blabla wikipedia” in google instead of first opening wikipedia and then use the search feature there. In most cases the page I’m looking is on top.

]]> By: Sanjeev.NET » Blog Archive » links for 2006-08-17 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Sanjeev.NET » Blog Archive » links for 2006-08-17 Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:23:27 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-4 [...] Davor Strehar @ Europe · AOL: 90% clicks on the first page, 4% on second (tags: aol search data) [...] [...] Davor Strehar @ Europe · AOL: 90% clicks on the first page, 4% on second (tags: aol search data) [...]

]]> By: Stephane Grenier http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Stephane Grenier Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:59:32 +0000 http://davors.eu/2006/08/aol-90-clicks-on-first-page-4-on-second/#comment-3 Hi, Your data is very interesting and very nicely presented. I especially like the graphs! I recently read an article at SeoBlackHat.com (http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/) where he ended up with very similar statistics from the AOL data. You might be interested to check it out as he also compares the AOL data with other search engines using the Overture tool, etc. Regards, Stephane Grenier Founder LandlordMax Property Management Software .http://www.LandlordMax.com .http://www.FollowSteph.com Hi,

Your data is very interesting and very nicely presented. I especially like the graphs!

I recently read an article at SeoBlackHat.com (http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/) where he ended up with very similar statistics from the AOL data. You might be interested to check it out as he also compares the AOL data with other search engines using the Overture tool, etc.

Regards,
Stephane Grenier
Founder
LandlordMax Property Management Software
.http://www.LandlordMax.com
.http://www.FollowSteph.com

]]>